<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: April Fool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://omvviewer.byteme.org.uk/index.php/2010/03/31/april-fool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://omvviewer.byteme.org.uk/index.php/2010/03/31/april-fool/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GC</title>
		<link>http://omvviewer.byteme.org.uk/index.php/2010/03/31/april-fool/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>GC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omvviewer.byteme.org.uk/?p=112#comment-21</guid>
		<description>At least someone in there has that feeling. I can finally build snow on my ubuntu box... even imported it into kdevelop4, but now it seems kinda pointless.

What was non-compliant about omv and imprudence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least someone in there has that feeling. I can finally build snow on my ubuntu box&#8230; even imported it into kdevelop4, but now it seems kinda pointless.</p>
<p>What was non-compliant about omv and imprudence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://omvviewer.byteme.org.uk/index.php/2010/03/31/april-fool/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omvviewer.byteme.org.uk/?p=112#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll see if i can do something about this. I need to make some changes to the omvviewer source to make it at least TVP compliant, then I can at least release that again. But its really a case of hom much time I have to keep up with all these changes all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll see if i can do something about this. I need to make some changes to the omvviewer source to make it at least TVP compliant, then I can at least release that again. But its really a case of hom much time I have to keep up with all these changes all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Padi Phillips</title>
		<link>http://omvviewer.byteme.org.uk/index.php/2010/03/31/april-fool/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Padi Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omvviewer.byteme.org.uk/?p=112#comment-18</guid>
		<description>How annoying it is not to be able to get OMV now - I&#039;m not really a Snowglobe fan, but if that&#039;s all there is, I guess I&#039;ll have to use it.  Could this be a ploy by LL to ensure that everyone uses their new Viewer 2?  I hope not, because good though it it is, (despite the negative comments from &#039;traditionalists&#039; and the computer illiterate) it narrows down choice.  However I can understand that developers may be wary of the new TVP policy that LL have brought in - perhaps they&#039;ll reconsider the wording of that policy in the light of this?  I certainly hope so, being someone who likes to try lots of different packages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How annoying it is not to be able to get OMV now &#8211; I&#8217;m not really a Snowglobe fan, but if that&#8217;s all there is, I guess I&#8217;ll have to use it.  Could this be a ploy by LL to ensure that everyone uses their new Viewer 2?  I hope not, because good though it it is, (despite the negative comments from &#8216;traditionalists&#8217; and the computer illiterate) it narrows down choice.  However I can understand that developers may be wary of the new TVP policy that LL have brought in &#8211; perhaps they&#8217;ll reconsider the wording of that policy in the light of this?  I certainly hope so, being someone who likes to try lots of different packages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

